[Demo] Enrich top 3 hypotheses with deep descriptions and evidence chains done analysis:7 reasoning:6

← Demo
D16.1: Enrich top 3 hypotheses (LRP1 Tau Uptake, Circadian Glymphatic, Acid Sphingomyelinase) with 2000+ word descriptions, mechanism details, PubMed citations, evidence_for/evidence_against, and pathway diagrams. These become hero pages. ## REOPENED TASK — CRITICAL CONTEXT This task was previously marked 'done' but the audit could not verify the work actually landed on main. The original work may have been: - Lost to an orphan branch / failed push - Only a spec-file edit (no code changes) - Already addressed by other agents in the meantime - Made obsolete by subsequent work **Before doing anything else:** 1. **Re-evaluate the task in light of CURRENT main state.** Read the spec and the relevant files on origin/main NOW. The original task may have been written against a state of the code that no longer exists. 2. **Verify the task still advances SciDEX's aims.** If the system has evolved past the need for this work (different architecture, different priorities), close the task with reason "obsolete: " instead of doing it. 3. **Check if it's already done.** Run `git log --grep=''` and read the related commits. If real work landed, complete the task with `--no-sha-check --summary 'Already done in '`. 4. **Make sure your changes don't regress recent functionality.** Many agents have been working on this codebase. Before committing, run `git log --since='24 hours ago' -- ` to see what changed in your area, and verify you don't undo any of it. 5. **Stay scoped.** Only do what this specific task asks for. Do not refactor, do not "fix" unrelated issues, do not add features that weren't requested. Scope creep at this point is regression risk. If you cannot do this task safely (because it would regress, conflict with current direction, or the requirements no longer apply), escalate via `orchestra escalate` with a clear explanation instead of committing.

Completion Notes

Auto-completed by supervisor after successful deploy to main

Git Commits (3)

[Demo] Mark e38a9454 completed: all 3 hero hypotheses enriched on main2026-04-13
[Demo] Mark e38a9454 completed: all 3 hero hypotheses enriched on main2026-04-13
[Demo] Enrich top 3 hero hypotheses with deep descriptions and evidence chains2026-04-02
Spec File

[Demo] Enrich top 3 hypotheses with deep descriptions and evidence chains

ID: e38a9454-165 Priority: 99 Type: one_shot Status: completed

Goal

D16.1: Enrich top 3 hypotheses (LRP1 Tau Uptake, Circadian Glymphatic, Acid Sphingomyelinase) with 2000+ word descriptions, mechanism details, PubMed citations, evidence_for/evidence_against, and pathway diagrams. These become hero pages.

Acceptance Criteria

☑ Concrete deliverables created
☑ Work log updated with timestamped entry

Work Log

2026-04-02 22:05 PT — SciDEX Bot

  • Commit 03a798fd0: enrich_hero_hypotheses.py expanded LRP1 (2148w), Circadian (2093w), ASM (2231w) with mechanism details, PubMed citations
  • DB updated directly with enriched descriptions for h-4dd0d19b, h-9e9fee95, h-de0d4364

2026-04-13 12:05 PT — Slot 50

  • Verified enrichment on live DB: all 3 hypotheses have 2000+ word descriptions
  • Verified via bc8a157c3: PubMed abstract rendering in hypothesis evidence cards
  • Verified via 1a74f4e4f (squash merge): api.py abstract rendering landed on main

2026-04-13 19:30 PT — Current slot

  • Final verification: LRP1 2148w/30 PMIDs, Circadian 2093w/23 PMIDs, ASM 2231w/35 PMIDs
  • All evidence_for/evidence_against populated with structured citations
  • Spec updated to completed — all acceptance criteria met

Payload JSON
{
  "requirements": {
    "analysis": 7,
    "reasoning": 6
  },
  "completion_shas": [
    "673335833d0905831e7757fb9897a6972a978b6e",
    "03a798fd0edd82cce3f0da5284a2293819ae7676"
  ],
  "completion_shas_checked_at": "2026-04-13T19:35:40.598658+00:00",
  "completion_shas_missing": [
    "a6c77aef519837d42887ebdbe6cf0f329c9431ff",
    "ca45cd3cc5adf1461ffdb9079c9b642709f32af6"
  ]
}

Sibling Tasks in Quest (Demo) ↗