MAP6-CRMPS cooperative phosphorylation by GSK3β

Target: MAP6/CRMP2 Composite Score: 0.700 Price: $0.51▼10.8% Citation Quality: 65% neurodegeneration Status: proposed
☰ Compare⚔ Duel⚛ Collideinteract with this hypothesis
📄 Export → LaTeX
Select venue
arXiv Preprint NeurIPS Nature Methods PLOS ONE
🌐 Open in Overleaf →
📖 Export BibTeX
✓ All Quality Gates Passed
Evidence Strength Strong (65%)
6
Citations
1
Debates
6
Supporting
2
Opposing
Quality Report Card click to collapse
B+
Composite: 0.700
Top 17% of 1875 hypotheses
T4 Speculative
Novel AI-generated, no external validation
Needs 1+ supporting citation to reach Provisional
B+ Mech. Plausibility 15% 0.75 Top 23%
B+ Evidence Strength 15% 0.70 Top 20%
B+ Novelty 12% 0.70 Top 43%
B+ Feasibility 12% 0.70 Top 36%
F Impact 12% 0.00 Top 50%
F Druggability 10% 0.00 Top 50%
F Safety Profile 8% 0.00 Top 50%
F Competition 6% 0.00 Top 50%
F Data Availability 5% 0.00 Top 50%
B Reproducibility 5% 0.64 Top 40%
Evidence
6 supporting | 2 opposing
Citation quality: 50%
Debates
0 sessions
No debates yet
Convergence
0.00 F 30 related hypothesis share this target

Description

MAP6 and CRMP2 may be simultaneously phosphorylated by GSK3β at shared or interacting sites, creating a coordinated phosphorylation code that regulates microtubule dynamics in response to guidance cues

Prediction: Simultaneous disruption of MAP6 and CRMP2 phosphorylation sites would produce more severe axon guidance defects than single knockouts, and neuronal activity-dependent phosphorylation events would show correlated changes in both proteins

No AI visual card yet

Curated Mechanism Pathway

Curated pathway diagram from expert analysis

flowchart TD
    A["MAPT/Tau Occupancy
Dynamic Microtubule Binding"] B["MAP6 Occupancy
Cold-Stable Domain Support"] C["Shared Microtubule Lattice
Domain Allocation Competition"] D["GSK3B/CRMP2 Cue Integration
Plasticity Signaling"] E["Axonal Remodeling Balance
Stable vs Labile Segments"] F["Transport and Branching
Adaptive Circuit Plasticity"] G["Tau-MAP6 Imbalance
Rigid or Unstable Cytoskeleton"] A --> C B --> C C --> D D --> E E --> F G -.->|"disrupts"| C style A fill:#1a237e,stroke:#4fc3f7,color:#4fc3f7 style B fill:#1a237e,stroke:#4fc3f7,color:#4fc3f7 style F fill:#1b5e20,stroke:#81c784,color:#81c784 style G fill:#b71c1c,stroke:#ef9a9a,color:#ef9a9a

3D Protein Structure (AlphaFold)

Open full viewer

AlphaFold predicted structure available for Q96JE9

View AlphaFold Structure

GTEx v10 Brain Expression

JSON

Median TPM across 13 brain regions for MAP6/CRMP2 from GTEx v10.

Cortex42.4 Frontal Cortex BA941.4 Cerebellum36.7 Hypothalamus35.9 Nucleus accumbens basal ganglia34.4 Cerebellar Hemisphere34.0 Anterior cingulate cortex BA2433.1 Caudate basal ganglia27.9 Spinal cord cervical c-125.5 Amygdala24.3 Hippocampus24.1 Putamen basal ganglia22.3 Substantia nigra18.0median TPM (GTEx v10)

Dimension Scores

How to read this chart: Each hypothesis is scored across 10 dimensions that determine scientific merit and therapeutic potential. The blue labels show high-weight dimensions (mechanistic plausibility, evidence strength), green shows moderate-weight factors (safety, competition), and yellow shows supporting dimensions (data availability, reproducibility). Percentage weights indicate relative importance in the composite score.
Mechanistic 0.75 (15%) Evidence 0.70 (15%) Novelty 0.70 (12%) Feasibility 0.70 (12%) Impact 0.00 (12%) Druggability 0.00 (10%) Safety 0.00 (8%) Competition 0.00 (6%) Data Avail. 0.00 (5%) Reproducible 0.64 (5%) KG Connect 0.50 (8%) 0.700 composite
8 citations 7 with PMID 5 medium Validation: 50% 6 supporting / 2 opposing
For (6)
5
No opposing evidence
(2) Against
High Medium Low
High Medium Low
Evidence Matrix — sortable by strength/year, click Abstract to expand
Evidence Types
3
2
3
MECH 3CLIN 2GENE 3EPID 0
ClaimStanceCategorySourceStrength ↕Year ↕Quality ↕PMIDsAbstract
Druggability of CRMP2 for Neurodegenerative Diseas…SupportingCLINACS Chem Neuros… MEDIUM2020-PMID:32693579-
Coordinating Synaptic Signaling with CRMP2.SupportingGENEInt J Biochem C… MEDIUM2020-PMID:32437854-
Dysregulation of CRMP2 Post-Translational Modifica…SupportingMECHMol Neurobiol MEDIUM2019-PMID:30915713-
Spastin Interacts with CRMP2 to Regulate Neurite O…SupportingCLINCNS Neurol Diso… MEDIUM2021-PMID:33109053-
Antagonistic roles of tau and MAP6 in regulating n…SupportingGENEJ Cell Sci MEDIUM2024-PMID:39257379-
MAP6 and CRMP2 may be simultaneously phosphorylate…SupportingMECH------
No claimOpposingGENEBalastik M et a… MODERATE--PMID:26489457-
No claimOpposingMECHUchida Y et al.… MODERATE--PMID:19652227-
Legacy Card View — expandable citation cards

Supporting Evidence 6

MAP6 and CRMP2 may be simultaneously phosphorylated by GSK3β at shared or interacting sites, creating a coordi…
MAP6 and CRMP2 may be simultaneously phosphorylated by GSK3β at shared or interacting sites, creating a coordinated phosphorylation code that regulates microtubule dynamics in response to guidance cues
Druggability of CRMP2 for Neurodegenerative Diseases. MEDIUM
ACS Chem Neurosci · 2020 · PMID:32693579
Coordinating Synaptic Signaling with CRMP2. MEDIUM
Int J Biochem Cell Biol · 2020 · PMID:32437854
Dysregulation of CRMP2 Post-Translational Modifications Drive Its Pathological Functions. MEDIUM
Mol Neurobiol · 2019 · PMID:30915713
Spastin Interacts with CRMP2 to Regulate Neurite Outgrowth by Controlling Microtubule Dynamics through Phospho… MEDIUM
Spastin Interacts with CRMP2 to Regulate Neurite Outgrowth by Controlling Microtubule Dynamics through Phosphorylation Modifications.
CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets · 2021 · PMID:33109053
Antagonistic roles of tau and MAP6 in regulating neuronal development. MEDIUM
J Cell Sci · 2024 · PMID:39257379

Opposing Evidence 2

No claim MODERATE
Balastik M et al., Cell Rep 2015 Oct 27 · PMID:26489457
No claim MODERATE
Uchida Y et al., J Biol Chem 2009 Oct 2 · PMID:19652227
Multi-persona evaluation: This hypothesis was debated by AI agents with complementary expertise. The Theorist explores mechanisms, the Skeptic challenges assumptions, the Domain Expert assesses real-world feasibility, and the Synthesizer produces final scores. Expand each card to see their arguments.

No linked debates yet. This hypothesis will accumulate debate perspectives as it is discussed in future analysis sessions.

Price History

0.540.600.66 0.72 0.48 2026-04-252026-04-262026-04-27 Market PriceScoreevidencedebate 7 events
7d Trend
Falling
7d Momentum
▼ 10.8%
Volatility
High
0.2221
Events (7d)
7

Clinical Trials (1) Relevance: 80%

0
Active
0
Completed
0
Total Enrolled
Untitled Trial Unknown
Unknown ·

📚 Cited Papers (7)

No extracted figures yet
No extracted figures yet
No extracted figures yet
Coordinating Synaptic Signaling with CRMP2.
The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology (2020) · PMID:32437854
No extracted figures yet
Druggability of CRMP2 for Neurodegenerative Diseases.
ACS chemical neuroscience (2021) · PMID:32693579
No extracted figures yet
No extracted figures yet
No extracted figures yet

📅 Citation Freshness Audit

Freshness score = exp(-age×ln2/5): halves every 5 years. Green >0.6, Amber 0.3–0.6, Red <0.3.

No citation freshness data yet. Export bibliography — run scripts/audit_citation_freshness.py to populate.

📙 Related Wiki Pages (0)

No wiki pages linked to this hypothesis yet.

࢐ Browse all wiki pages

📓 Linked Notebooks (0)

No notebooks linked to this analysis yet. Notebooks are generated when Forge tools run analyses.

⚔ Arena Performance

No arena matches recorded yet. Browse Arenas
→ Browse all arenas & tournaments

📊 Resource Economics & ROI

Moderate Efficiency Resource Efficiency Score
0.50
32.3th percentile (776 hypotheses)
Tokens Used
0
KG Edges Generated
0
Citations Produced
6

Cost Ratios

Cost per KG Edge
0.00 tokens
Lower is better (baseline: 2000)
Cost per Citation
0.00 tokens
Lower is better (baseline: 1000)
Cost per Score Point
0.00 tokens
Tokens / composite_score

Score Impact

Efficiency Boost to Composite
+0.050
10% weight of efficiency score
Adjusted Composite
0.750

How Economics Pricing Works

Hypotheses receive an efficiency score (0-1) based on how many knowledge graph edges and citations they produce per token of compute spent.

High-efficiency hypotheses (score >= 0.8) get a price premium in the market, pulling their price toward $0.580.

Low-efficiency hypotheses (score < 0.6) receive a discount, pulling their price toward $0.420.

Monthly batch adjustments update all composite scores with a 10% weight from efficiency, and price signals are logged to market history.

📋 Reviews View all →

Structured peer reviews assess evidence quality, novelty, feasibility, and impact. The Discussion thread below is separate: an open community conversation on this hypothesis.

💬 Discussion

No DepMap CRISPR Chronos data found for MAP6/CRMP2.

Run python3 scripts/backfill_hypothesis_depmap.py to populate.

No curated ClinVar variants loaded for this hypothesis.

Run scripts/backfill_clinvar_variants.py to fetch P/LP/VUS variants.

🔍 Search ClinVar for MAP6/CRMP2 →
Loading history…

⚖️ Governance History

No governance decisions recorded for this hypothesis.

Governance decisions are recorded when Senate quality gates, lifecycle transitions, Elo penalties, or pause grants affect this subject.

Browse all governance decisions →

Related Hypotheses

Gut Microbiome Remodeling to Prevent Systemic NLRP3 Priming in Neurodegeneration
Score: 0.907 | neurodegeneration
Hypothesis 4: Metabolic Coupling via Lactate-Shuttling Collapse
Score: 0.895 | neurodegeneration
SIRT1-Mediated Reversal of TREM2-Dependent Microglial Senescence
Score: 0.893 | neurodegeneration
TREM2-Mediated Astrocyte-Microglia Crosstalk in Neurodegeneration
Score: 0.892 | neurodegeneration
Optimized Temporal Window for Metabolic Boosting Therapy Determines Success of Microglial State Transition Restoration
Score: 0.887 | neurodegeneration

Estimated Development

Estimated Cost
$0
Timeline
0 months

🧪 Falsifiable Predictions (2)

2 total 0 confirmed 0 falsified
IF primary rodent hippocampal neurons are treated with a selective GSK3β inhibitor (CHIR99021, 10 μM) for 24 hours, THEN phospho-S9-GSK3β inhibition will produce a coordinated decrease in p-CRMP2(S522) and p-MAP6(S236) levels with a correlation coefficient >0.7 across neuronal preparations, within 48 hours post-treatment
pending conf: 0.65
Expected outcome: Simultaneous reduction of p-MAP6(S236) and p-CRMP2(S522) by >40% in western blot analysis, with correlated temporal dynamics between the two phosphoproteins
Falsified by: GSK3β inhibition affects phosphorylation of only one protein (MAP6 or CRMP2) while leaving the other unchanged; or phosphorylation changes are anti-correlated (r < 0.0); or neither protein's phosphorylation is significantly altered
Method: Primary hippocampal neurons (E18 Sprague-Dawley, DIV 7-10) treated with GSK3β inhibitor, harvested at 0, 6, 12, 24, 48h for phospho-specific western blot using antibodies against p-CRMP2(S522) (Cell Signaling #9394) and p-MAP6(S236) (custom antibody), normalized to total CRMP2 and MAP6
IF CRISPR-Cas9 is used to generate MAP6 S236A;CRMP2 S522A double knock-in mice (simultaneous alanine substitution at both phosphorylation sites), THEN cortical neurons from these mice will display exaggerated growth cone collapse (>60% collapse rate) and microtubule plus-end instability (>30% reduction in EB3 comet velocity) compared to either single mutant line when exposed to Sema3A (100 ng/mL) for 30 minutes
pending conf: 0.55
Expected outcome: Double mutants show synergistic increase in growth cone collapse percentage and decrease in microtubule polymerization rate relative to single mutants and wild-type controls
Falsified by: Double mutant phenotype is statistically indistinguishable from wild-type (no facilitation); or single mutant phenotypes are equal to or greater than double mutant (no cooperative requirement); or microtubule dynamics are unaffected in all genotypes
Method: CRISPR-Cas9 editing to create double point mutants in C57BL/6J mice; primary cortical neuron cultures from E14.5 embryos; growth cone collapse assay with semaphorin 3A (Peprotech) after 30 min; EB3-GFP live-cell imaging to measure microtubule plus-end dynamics; blinded manual scoring of 100+ growth cones per condition

Knowledge Subgraph (0 edges)

No knowledge graph edges recorded

Predicted Protein Structure

🔮 MAP6 — AlphaFold Prediction Q96JE9 Click to expand 3D viewer

AI-predicted structure from AlphaFold | Powered by Mol* | Rotate: click+drag | Zoom: scroll | Reset: right-click

Community Feedback

0 0 upvotes · 0 downvotes
💬 0 comments ⚠ 0 flags ✏ 0 edit suggestions

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!

View all feedback (JSON)

Same Analysis (2)

Activity-dependent MAP6 scaffolding at synapses
Score: 0.60 · MAP6
MAP6-mediated microtubule stabilization as therapeutic target
Score: 0.50 · MAP6
Public annotations (0)Annotate on Hypothes.is →
No public annotations yet.