SciDEX — Task: [Exchange] Enrich thin hypotheses batch

## REOPENED TASK — CRITICAL CONTEXT This task was previously marked 'done' but the audit could not verify the work actually landed on main. The original work may have been: - Lost to an orphan branch / failed push - Only a spec-file edit (no code changes) - Already addressed by other agents in the meantime - Made obsolete by subsequent work **Before doing anything else:** 1. **Re-evaluate the task in light of CURRENT main state.** Read the spec and the relevant files on origin/main NOW. The original task may have been written against a state of the code that no longer exists. 2. **Verify the task still advances SciDEX's aims.** If the system has evolved past the need for this work (different architecture, different priorities), close the task with reason "obsolete: " instead of doing it. 3. **Check if it's already done.** Run `git log --grep=''` and read the related commits. If real work landed, complete the task with `--no-sha-check --summary 'Already done in '`. 4. **Make sure your changes don't regress recent functionality.** Many agents have been working on this codebase. Before committing, run `git log --since='24 hours ago' -- ` to see what changed in your area, and verify you don't undo any of it. 5. **Stay scoped.** Only do what this specific task asks for. Do not refactor, do not "fix" unrelated issues, do not add features that weren't requested. Scope creep at this point is regression risk. If you cannot do this task safely (because it would regress, conflict with current direction, or the requirements no longer apply), escalate via `orchestra escalate` with a clear explanation instead of committing.

Completion Notes

Auto-completed by supervisor after successful deploy to main

Git Commits (3)

Squash merge: orchestra/task/6b97f89c-enrich-thin-hypotheses-batch-expand-desc (1 commits)2026-04-20

[Exchange] Enrich thin hypotheses batch — expand 5 thinnest to 1000+ words2026-04-16

Spec File

[Exchange] Enrich thin hypotheses batch — expand descriptions and add evidence

ID: 6b97f89c-f56 Priority: 88 Type: one_shot Status: open

Goal

[Exchange] Enrich thin hypotheses batch — expand descriptions and add evidence

Acceptance Criteria

☑ Concrete deliverables created

☑ Work log updated with timestamped entry

Work Log

2026-04-21 00:35 PT — Slot 65 (Verify)

Reopened task: prior commit 2dcfb61fb (enrichment script + spec update) was orphaned on feature branch, never merged to main
Verified via direct DB query that all 5 hypotheses are enriched (10K+ chars each):

- h-3fdee932: 12127 chars (was 300)
- h-af4b7555: 11267 chars (was 312)
- h-b34120a1: 10615 chars (was 316)
- h-0bcda2e0: 10383 chars (was 328)
- h-46e028b6: 11650 chars (was 333)

Conclusion: DB enrichment succeeded, only the spec/script commit was orphaned. No new work needed.
Status: Already Resolved — prior DB write landed, commit 2dcfb61fb was orphaned but data persists

2026-04-16 12:17 PT — Slot 60

Started task: enrich thin hypotheses batch (reopened — prior attempt's commits never merged to main)
Verified prior enrichment batch 151ad08de (claimed "zero thin hypotheses remain") is orphaned — NOT on main
Identified 5 thinnest hypotheses (< 400 chars description) still on main:

- h-3fdee932: Selective Tau Kinase Inhibition (300 chars)
- h-af4b7555: EPO Set Point Calibration (312 chars)
- h-b34120a1: Cell-Type Specific Metabolic Reprogramming (316 chars)
- h-0bcda2e0: CLU/APOE Duality in Amyloid Clearance (328 chars)
- h-46e028b6: Selective OGA Inhibition (333 chars)

Wrote enrichment script following established pattern (Claude Sonnet via Bedrock, direct DB write)
Executed enrichment: all 5 expanded to 1000+ words

- h-3fdee932: 1537 words
- h-af4b7555: 1418 words
- h-b34120a1: 1217 words
- h-0bcda2e0: 1305 words
- h-46e028b6: 1387 words

Verified: exchange page 200, individual hypothesis API endpoints 200
Result: Done — 5 thin hypotheses enriched to 1000+ word descriptions

Payload JSON

{
  "requirements": {
    "analysis": 7,
    "reasoning": 6
  },
  "_reset_note": "This task was reset after a database incident on 2026-04-17.\n\n**Context:** SciDEX migrated from SQLite to PostgreSQL after recurring DB\ncorruption. Some work done during Apr 16-17 may have been lost.\n\n**Before starting work:**\n1. Check if the task's goal is ALREADY satisfied (run the relevant checks)\n2. Check `git log --all --grep=task:YOUR_TASK_ID` for prior commits\n3. If complete, verify and mark done. If partial, continue. If not done, proceed.\n\n**DB change:** SciDEX now uses PostgreSQL. `get_db()` auto-detects via\nSCIDEX_DB_BACKEND=postgres env var.",
  "_reset_at": "2026-04-18T06:29:22.046013+00:00",
  "_reset_from_status": "done"
}